Government Can Cancel Agent and Dealer Licences, Ban Conveyancers, and Share Info with Federal Agencies
Fair Trading and Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2026
Legislative Assembly
Legislative Council
Assent
Topics
building industry building standards consumer protection fair trading first home buyers information sharing professional licensing property agents real estate residential tenancies strata management +6 more
Introduced by: The Hon Anoulack Chanthivong MP (ALP); The Hon Penny Sharpe MLC (ALP)
Links to official parliament websites
Effects of this bill
If this bill passes, it means that:
The Debate
What different members said when this bill was debated:
Chris Rath LIB
“On behalf of the Opposition, I speak in debate on the Fair Trading and Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2026. This is an omnibus bill that amends 22 Acts. A large proportion of the measures are minor or administrative and make sensible changes to bring the law up to date. Strengthening the licensing tools available to NSW Fair Trading makes sense, and the Opposition supports those measures.”
Cate Faehrmann GRN
“As The Greens spokesperson on fair trading and building, I speak in support of the Fair Trading and Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2026. It seeks to make changes to 22 Acts within the Better Regulation and Fair Trading and Building portfolios. Most changes are minor and administrative in nature, but a small number could have unintended consequences, which I will discuss further.”
John Ruddick LIBT
“The Libertarian Party opposes the Fair Trading and Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2026. This bill is a stark reminder of how shameless the Government is in thinking it has all the answers, that more regulation can solve the housing crisis and more government power will somehow bring about social outcomes. The Government is wrong. This is the Government putting bandaids on bandaids.”
Mark Latham IND
“It is often my melancholy duty in this place to correct historical canards. As much as I respect the Hon. John Ruddick and his raging campaign against the modern Liberal Party—of which he knows a lot, campaigning for plebiscites and the like—I can report to the House that Bob Hawke was never the Minister for deregulation.”
Emily Suvaal ALP
“I speak in support of the Fair Trading and Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2026. The bill introduces a range of balanced, practical and reasonable amendments across the Better Regulation and Fair Trading and Building portfolios to ensure the effective regulation of licence holders within those portfolios.”
Mark Buttigieg ALP
“Chris Rath, Ms Cate Faehrmann, the Hon. John Ruddick, the Hon. Mark Latham and the Hon. Emily Suvaal. The bill will implement reforms that amend various Acts across the Better Regulation and Fair Trading and Building portfolios. Although the bill makes a range of minor amendments to various Acts, it remains a bill of requirement—a critical piece of legislation.”
News articles and press releases
Second Reading Speech - Lower House (first house)
Mr ANOULACK CHANTHIVONG, Minister for Better Regulation and Fair Trading — 2026-02-04
... the bill amends the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 by renaming the term \\\"business day\\\" to \\\"working day\\\", without altering its meaning or application. Currently, the definition of \\\"business day\\\" in this Act is different to the meaning of \\\"business day\\\" within the Interpretation Act 1987, so this inconsistency needs to be rectified. [...] Building practitioners are currently exempt from holding professional indemnity insurance as there are no available insurance products to satisfy their legislative requirements. Without this exemption, building practitioners would need to cease work on regulated buildings, namely classes 2, 3 and 9c, causing significant delays to the delivery of housing across New South Wales. The existing scope of the regulation‑making power requires the exemption to be remade every 12 months. Concerns have been raised by the Legislative Council\\\'s Delegated Legislation Committee that the scope of the regulation‑making power allows for only a one‑off 12‑month period exemption. The removal of the existing 12‑month limitation will address those concerns and ensure building practitioners continue to be exempt from professional indemnity requirements for an appropriate period until the market develops a complying product, providing certainty to industry.