Digital intermediaries are not liable for publishing digital matter if they only provide caching, conduit, or storage services

Courts can make orders against non-party digital intermediaries regarding defamatory digital matter

Courts must consider privacy, safety, and public interest before making orders against intermediaries; this includes whether a poster fears domestic violence

The defence of absolute privilege is updated for publications made to police officials

Courts can postpone deciding if a digital intermediary is exempt from liability; they must consider the cost to the parties

Defendants in defamation cases are deemed to have taken reasonable steps to prevent access to digital matter if those steps were reasonable in the circumstances

Legal documents can be served via email or other electronic messaging