FED People Cannot Be Punished for Sharing Secret Information With Royal Commissions

Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026

House of Representatives

Senate

Assent

Share this bill

Introduced by: The Hon Michelle Rowland MP (ALP)

Links to official parliament websites

Official page: progress through parliament

Effects of this bill

If this bill passes, it means that:

People cannot use secrecy laws as an excuse to refuse giving intelligence or operationally sensitive information, documents, or statements to the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, and must answer questions even if the answer would disclose such information.
People who give relevant intelligence or sensitive information to a Royal Commission are protected from secrecy penalties and this information cannot be used as evidence against them in court, provided they follow the established and published arrangements.
Legal practitioners and their clients are immune from secrecy laws when sharing intelligence or sensitive information to get or give legal advice or representation regarding a Royal Commission, provided the person receiving the information has the right security clearance.
A person has a legal defence against prosecution for handling or leaking secret information if they can show they did so to give it to a Royal Commission because they believed it was relevant.
Royal Commissions can use and share intelligence or sensitive information to perform their duties, provided they follow the established and published arrangements.
The Department Secretary must publish all intelligence and operationally sensitive information arrangements.
The Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Royal Commission is subject to these rules.

The Debate

What different members said when this bill was debated:

Michelle Rowland ALP

“I move: That this bill be now read a second time. Royal commissions are the highest form of independent inquiry in Australia, and as such it is important they have strong powers and immunities available to complete their work. Accordingly, this bill will establish a framework for royal commissions to receive and handle operationally sensitive and intelligence information.”

Official source →

Julian Leeser LIB

“I rise to speak on the Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026. This legislation proposes significant changes to the Royal Commissions Act. It aims to ensure that the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion and future royal commissions can access intelligence and operationally sensitive information.”

Official source →

Allegra Spender IND

“I rise to speak on the Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026. On 14 December, my community experienced a loss and trauma that will stay with us for, I think, as long as we live.”

Official source →

Michaelia Cash LIB

“I rise to make a contribution to the Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026. I will say it at the outset: now that the government, whilst it has been dragged kicking and screaming to set up the royal commission, has finally established the royal commission, it does have a responsibility to ensure that the commission can do its job.”

Official source →

David Shoebridge GRN

“Isn’t it extraordinary; the coalition is getting up here and complaining that there wasn’t sufficient time for an inquiry into and proper scrutiny of the Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026.”

Official source →

Nita Green ALP

“I thank my parliamentary colleagues for their contributions to this debate. The Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026 creates a clear lawful pathway for people to provide intelligence and operationally sensitive information to a royal commission, including to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion.”

Official source →