Presumption of Employment for Religious Practitioners in Child Sexual Abuse Claims
Civil Liability Amendment (Child Sexual Abuse Actions) Bill 2025
Legislative Assembly
Legislative Council
Assent
Topics
child sexual abuse employment relationship legal liability religious institutions settlement agreements
Links to official parliament websites
Effects of this bill
If this bill passes, it means that:
The Debate
What different members said when this bill was debated:
Dan Caddy ALP
“I move: That the bill be now read a second time. On 13 November 2024, the High Court of Australia decided in the case of Bird v DP, (a pseudonym) [2024] HCA 41, which I will refer to as Bird. Bird was concerned with the question of whether vicarious liability applies to non-employment relationships.”
Dr Tony Buti ALP
“I move: That the bill be now read a second time. On 13 November 2024, the High Court of Australia decided the case of Bird v DP (a pseudonym) [2024] HCA 41, which I will refer to as Bird. Bird was concerned with the question of whether vicarious liability applies to non-employment relationships.”
News articles and press releases
Bill Strengthens Civil Claims for Church Abuse Victims
Jessica Stojkovski, WA Minister for Child Protection — 2025-11-12
This legislation makes it clear that those who hold authority and power in institutions must also bear responsibility.